• Call for applications to participate in Round 3 of the Canadian Multi-Model Comparison Forum
    Apply now!

    Overview

    📌 Current participants do not need to reapply.

    Following the success of Rounds 1 and 2, the Energy Modelling Hub (EMH) is launching Round 3 of the Multi-Model Comparison Forum (MMCF).

    Round 3 introduces a significant evolution: a two-track architecture that separates methodological comparison work from structured, policy-facing exercises — allowing the MMCF to serve both the modelling community and federal, provincial, and territorial partners more effectively.

    The Forum remains Canada’s primary platform for collaborative energy modelling, bringing together approximately 25–30 teams from academia, government, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations to compare results, understand model divergence, and build shared methodological knowledge.

    Two-track architecture

    1. Technical track Longer-cycle, methodological exercises designed for modelling teams who want to stress-test their approaches and contribute to cross-model learning.
      • Themes are being finalized and will include questions such as how models represent time (representative days), how foresight is treated in myopic versus perfect-foresight modelling, how to improve the computational performance of Canadian energy models, and how to model the electrification of end uses. Additional themes will be defined in consultation with participating teams. Teams are welcome to propose their own themes and to express interest in leading an exercise.
    2. Policy track Focused 4–6 month exercises designed to address specific analytical questions submitted by federal, provincial, and territorial partners. Each exercise produces a concise, multi-model synthesis report designed to inform policy development. Policy track themes for Round 3 are being finalized with the Steering Committee.

     

    Working groups

    The MMCF’s exercises are carried out through two standing working groups, organized by modelling domain. We are currently recruiting members for both:

    • Electricity Modelling Working Group (WG1) — power systems, capacity expansion, and dispatch models
    • Energy System Modelling Working Group (WG2) — energy-economy, integrated assessment, and macro models

    Current participants do not need to reapply.

    📅 Expression of Interest Deadline: June 19, 2026, at 5 PM ET.

    Key Dates

    • June 2026: Technical track kick-off with participating teams
    • June–July 2026: Scientific lead recruitment for priority themes
    • July–September 2026: Exercise design and common assumption development
    • September–November 2026: Modelling runs
    • December 2026: MMCF presentations at the Annual EMH Forum, Ottawa

     

    Policy track timeline will be confirmed once themes are finalized with the Steering Committee.

    Purpose and Approach

    The MMCF aims to enhance transparency and credibility in Canadian energy and electricity system modelling. Through structured comparison of results, methodologies, and assumptions, it builds a shared analytical foundation for policy discussions. Round 3 places greater emphasis on policy relevance, earlier involvement of policy stakeholders in exercise design, and synthesis outputs designed to be directly usable by decision-makers.

    How to Apply

    Interested participants can submit an expression of interest via this form. Applications are welcome from modelling teams affiliated with academic institutions, government bodies, private consultants, non-profit organizations, and relevant industries.

    Applicants should be model developers, modellers, or key stakeholders in energy and electricity modelling, with a willingness to contribute actively to model comparison, evaluation, and discussion. We encourage applications from diverse groups across geographic locations, institutional affiliations, and professional backgrounds.

    Eligibility Requirements
    • Affiliation: Open to participants from the Canadian Modelling Ecosystem, including individuals affiliated with academic institutions, government bodies, private consultants, not-for-profit organisations, and relevant industries.
    • Role and Expertise: Applicants should be model developers, modellers, or key stakeholders in energy and electricity modelling. This includes both individuals and representatives of institutions or organizations engaged in relevant modelling work.
    • Contribution Willingness: Applicants must demonstrate a willingness to actively contribute to model comparison, evaluation, and discussion processes. This includes a commitment to adhere to the guidelines and objectives set by the forum’s working groups.
    • Diversity and Inclusion: We encourage applications from diverse groups, aiming for a broad representation in terms of geographic location, institutional affiliation, and professional experience.
    How to submit your application?

    Submit your expression of interest via this form.

    Questions or comments: [email protected]

    Apply before June 9, 2026

    What we're looking for
    • Relevant modelling expertise — capacity to contribute to this year’s thematic streams
    • A collaborative spirit — willingness to share knowledge, engage with diverse perspectives, and participate actively across forum activities
    • Openness — readiness to share models, assumptions, and results transparently, ideally in open-source formats
    • Relevance to Canada’s energy challenges — work that connects to national energy priorities
    • A distinctive contribution — approaches or models that add something new to the mix
  • Call for Presentations & Posters: 2026 Annual Forum
    Save the Date: December 16-17, 2026 - Ottawa (ON)

    EMH Annual Forum 2026 · 5th Edition — Call for Panelists & Posters

    Where Models Meet Reality
    December 16–17, 2026 · Carleton University, Ottawa

    We are thrilled to invite you to participate in the 2026 EMH Annual Forum, which will be held on December 16-17, in Ottawa. The theme of this year’s event is “When Models Meet Reality.” As governments across Canada are setting out ambitious visions for the energy transition, this Forum asks what it takes to turn those ambitions into decisions that get made and infrastructure that gets built, and whether we’re even asking the right questions.

    Call for Panelists – Guidelines

    Rather than a call for presentations, we’re issuing a call for panelists. Each session below is built around a set of guiding questions. Tell us which ones you’d like to engage with, and what angle you’d bring to the discussion, analytical, economic, policy, regulatory, industry, or lived experience. We’re looking for participants across a wide range of backgrounds, and we’ll build panels that put those different angles in conversation with one another.

    If you prefer to submit a poster, please indicate that on the form, a poster pitch competition runs both days. Please encourage your students and colleagues to submit their applications!

    Apply by August 21

     

    Session 1: What models tell us about the transition vision

    Governments across Canada are putting forward competing visions for the electricity transition. This session asks what our models actually tell us about those paths.

    • Can current modelling tell us whether proposed build-outs are deliverable, not just least-cost on paper?
    • Are these paths even least-cost, toward what: affordability, decarbonization, or energy security?
    • Where are the blind spots: financing, labour, supply chains?
    • Where do choices raise rights, environmental, or safety concerns regardless of approval speed?
    • What energy-security and geopolitical risks do these paths introduce?

     

    Session 2: Where the blind spots are: what models miss about the vision

    This session asks where our models fall short, on demand, behaviour, markets, and more, and what it would take to close those gaps.

    • What does multi-model comparison reveal about where models agree, diverge, and which gaps matter for decisions?
    • How well do we model demand growth, efficiency, flexibility, and sufficiency?
    • How do we handle exogenous shocks like AI-driven demand growth?
    • Where do models still fail to capture real-world behaviour, markets, and prices?
    • How do we move toward shared, reproducible infrastructure the whole community can trust?

     

    Session 3: Interties, from “optimal” to built

    Interties have looked cost-effective for years without breaking ground. This session brings economists, regulators, and transition experts into the room to say what’s missing.

    • What are models leaving out that explains why “optimal” interties don’t get built?
    • How should cost allocation be represented, given it’s what stalls projects?
    • Can institutions and regulatory machinery actually deliver interties?
    • What is the political economy of interties: whose interests align, whose don’t?
    • What should modellers build into their work to make results actionable?

     

    Session 4: Value chains and industrial strength

    From critical minerals to components, this session puts industry practitioners alongside modellers to ask where Canada can build real industrial strength.

    • Where can Canada build genuine strength in transition value chains?
    • Where does electrification work for heavy industry, and where doesn’t it?
    • How well do models handle alternatives: CCUS, hydrogen, alternative fuels?
    • What does industrial reality look like from the plant floor?
    • How does political economy, incumbents, competitiveness, carbon costs, shape modelling assumptions?

     

    Session 5: Affordable, reliable, and efficient: electrification and the demand side

    This session asks how demand management, flexibility, and efficiency reshape what a reliable grid actually requires.

    • How sensitive are build-out conclusions to demand assumptions?
    • How large and uncertain is new load from AI and data centres?
    • What can demand-side management and efficiency realistically deliver?
    • How do costs and benefits of electrification land across regions and households?
    • How do we weigh trade-offs between affordability, reliability, and decarbonization?

     

    Session 6: AI and the frontier of modelling

    AI is changing how modelling gets done. This session asks where it genuinely strengthens the workflow, and where it introduces risk.

    • Where can AI reliably improve modelling, and where does it introduce risk?
    • How can AI help with data cleaning, gap-filling, and harmonization?
    • Can AI speed up modelling while keeping results trustworthy?
    • What role can AI play in interpreting and communicating results for decision-makers?
    • How do we preserve transparency and reproducibility when AI is in the loop?

     

    Session 7: Deciding under uncertainty 

    The closing session turns from results to judgment: what models can justifiably claim, and how to decide well when they disagree and the future is genuinely uncertain.

    • What can we justifiably claim from a model, and what should we not?
    • When models disagree, how do we decide, and what does comparison tell us?
    • Is scenario-based planning still enough, or do we need risk-based and adaptive approaches?
    • How do we make long-term, path-dependent decisions under deep uncertainty?
    • How do we communicate limits honestly to policymakers while keeping their trust?
    Deadline and Submission Form

    Important Dates

    • Submission deadline: August 21, 2026
    • Panelist selection by: September 11, 2026
    • Annual Forum dates: December 16–17, 2026